-
The stories we tell: qualitative research interviews, talking technologies and the ‘normalisation’ of life with HIV.
December 28, 2015 Editor 0
Related Articles The stories we tell: qualitative research interviews, talking technologies and the ‘normalisation’ of life with HIV.
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Apr;131:66-73
Authors: Mazanderani F, Paparini S
Abstract
Since the earliest days of the HIV/AIDS epidemic, talking about the virus has been a key way affected communities have challenged the fear and discrimination directed against them and pressed for urgent medical and political attention. Today, HIV/AIDS is one of the most prolifically and intimately documented of all health conditions, with entrenched infrastructures, practices and technologies–what Vinh-Kim Nguyen has dubbed ‘confessional technologies’–aimed at encouraging those affected to share their experiences. Among these technologies, we argue, is the semi-structured interview: the principal methodology used in qualitative social science research focused on patient experiences. Taking the performative nature of the research interview as a talking technology seriously has epistemological implications not merely for how we interpret interview data, but also for how we understand the role of research interviews in the enactment of ‘life with HIV’. This paper focuses on one crucial aspect of this enactment: the contemporary ‘normalisation’ of HIV as ‘just another’ chronic condition–a process taking place at the level of individual subjectivities, social identities, clinical practices and global health policy, and of which social science research is a vital part. Through an analysis of 76 interviews conducted in London (2009-10), we examine tensions in the experiential narratives of individuals living with HIV in which life with the virus is framed as ‘normal’, yet where this ‘normality’ is beset with contradictions and ambiguities. Rather than viewing these as a reflection of resistances to or failures of the enactment of HIV as ‘normal’, we argue that, insofar as these contradictions are generated by the research interview as a distinct ‘talking technology’, they emerge as crucial to the normative (re)production of what counts as ‘living with HIV’ (in the UK) and are an inherent part of the broader performative ‘normalisation’ of the virus.PMID: 25753287 [PubMed – indexed for MEDLINE]
Related Posts
Customer knowledge management, innovation capability, and business performance: a case study of the banking industry
Service delivery becomes a major priority for science council
How I Got My Team To Fail More
Call for applications: Android Deep Dive training with Intel- The First Two Steps Toward Breaking Down Silos in Your Organization
The ethics of artificial intelligence
Genetic differentiation analysis for the identification of complementary parental pools for sorghum hybrid breeding in Ethiopia. Scaling up drought tolerant maize in Zambia
