-
Do “rising stars” avoid risk?: status-based labels and decision making
March 3, 2014 Editor 0
Abstract
Purpose – The purpose of this study was to empirically examine how status-based labels, based on future capabilities, can impact people’s risk tolerance in decision making. Design/methodology/approach – In this paper we developed and tested theoretical arguments using a set of three studies employing a scenario-based approach and a total of 449 undergraduate business studentsFindings – The findings suggest that labeling people in terms of future capabilities can trigger perceptions of public scrutiny and influence their risk preferences. Specifically, the results reveal that individuals who are recipients of high-status labels tend to choose lower risk decision options compared to their peers. Research limitations/implications – The study employed scenarios to examine the issue of employee labeling. The extent to which these scenarios have truly captured the dynamics of labeling is questionable, and future research should employ a field based study to examine whether the reported effect can be observed in a “real” work context. Practical implications – Organizations are concerned about their future leadership capacity and often attempt to grow leadership talent by identifying high-potential employees early on. The results of this study suggest that such practice may have an unintentional negative effect of reducing high-potentials’ tolerance toward risky decision making, thus potentially impacting these future leaders’ decision making in the realm of corporate strategy, R&D, etc.Originality/value – The issue of how labeling individuals in terms of future capabilities can impact their risk preference has been largely ignored by organizational research. This paper suggests that the popular practice of identifying high-potential employees may have unintentional negative effects by lowering their risk tolerance.
Go to SourceRelated Posts
60-Second Drills Can Sharpen Your Business Reflexes
Stop Worrying About Making the Right Decision
The Six-Minute Guide to Making Better High-Stakes Decisions
Why You Should Crowd-Source Your Toughest Investment Decisions
The Most Innovative Companies Don’t Worry About Consensus
9 Habits That Lead to Terrible Decisions
Categories: Management
Tags: Decision theory, decision-making
The relationships amongst leader-member exchange, perceived organizational support, affective commitment, and in-role performance: A social-exchange perspective. When entrepreneurial identity meets multiple social identities: Interplays and identity work of women entrepreneurs
Subscribe to our stories
Recent Posts
- SL Crowd Green Solutions September 21, 2020
- Digital transformation in the banking sector: surveys exploration and analytics August 3, 2020
- Why Let Others Disrupt You? Take the Smart Self-Disruption Journey! August 3, 2020
- 5 Tips for Crowdfunding During the Pandemic August 3, 2020
- innovation + africa; +639 new citations August 3, 2020
Categories
Archives
Popular Post-All time
- A review on biomass-based... 0.9k views
- Can blockchain disrupt ge... 672 views
- Prize-winning projects pr... 646 views
- Apply Now: $500,000 for Y... 602 views
- Test Your Value Propositi... 524 views