Innovation in tradition-based firms: dynamic knowledge for international competitiveness
October 14, 2013 Editor 0
Purpose – The present research aims at proposing a model of innovation and internationalization for SMEs and at testing it on tradition-based firms. These are SMEs whose productions reflect their territory’s cultural identity. They are often micro-firms and weak in global markets. Since these firms characterize the European and Italian offer, the scientific challenge is to verify whether there are possible strategic paths, mainly based on interfirm collaboration and dynamic knowledge, that can help them getting higher levels of competitiveness. More specifically, the proposed model aims at understanding if it is possible to overcome these firms’ weaknesses through collaboration in networking perspective.Design/methodology/approach – Methodology uses theoretical backgrounds in order to define hypotheses. The main approach starts from contributions on RBT and dynamic capabilities and their possible linkages in the internationalization perspective. Thus, considering the aims, we analyze if according to resource – based approach, dynamic capabilities allow entrepreneurs to seek opportunities which become strategic resources for a sustainable competitive advantage. This issue is analyzed both in theoretical terms and in its empirical implications in artistic-craft sector. The empirical research has been designed in order to explain knowledge creation and transfer processes, in terms of firms’ competitiveness. Particularly, the analysis adopts multiple case studies methodology.Findings – Tradition-based “Made in Italy” SMEs, as depicted in the empirical analysis, are characterized by limited size and scarce financial resources. This situation determines a difficult access to innovation in order to compete in global market. Thus, our research has highlighted that the only internationalization path, useful for this kind of firms, is cooperation, in a networking perspective. Firms that succeed in this process not only set the basis for survival but even to gain competitive advantage.Research limitations/implications – Even if this study explores some interesting findings, some limitations should be considered. First of all, a limitation is in the complexity of linking together different theoretical approaches, each of which could take the dignity of independent research. Nonetheless, in a rational sequence of stages, the research aims at reaching the methodology formalization for analysis validation. Empirical research could be improved refining the sample in order to reach better results generalization. Besides, further generalization would require to confront results with other similar industries. Moreover, the use of case studies creates richness in detail, but lacks in simplicity of overall perspective.Practical implications – Through this analysis, we propose a model of innovation and internationalization for SMEs’ development. Particularly, the model will be replicable to all those firms that are expression of cultural identity (for example: “made in”) and of tradition, for which innovation and internationalization can represent useful keys to compete globally.Originality/value – The paper provides a connection between RBT, dynamic capabilities and internationalization theories applied to tradition-based sectors, such as craft, in search of innovation, in order to compete internationally. So we investigate also on the internationalization and networking processes, in order to verify if combined dynamic capabilities and resources are able to make these firms more competitive. Moreover, the research field is quite unexplored and represents an important step in the theoretical and empirical evolution.
Go to Source
- Delivering Solutions for Growth: Promoting Competitiveness and Innovation through Activist Strategies
- US lead in science and technology shrinking
- ITIF Welcomes Release of “The Competitiveness and Innovative Capacity of the United States” Report
- Determinants of Innovation Commercialization Management and Anticipated Returns: An Exploratory Typology of SMEs
- Pushing the boundaries – part 1: Understanding the different “faces” of open innovation
- The Innovation Management Maturity Model: How Do You Stack Up?
Subscribe to our stories
- Device that recycles vaporized water from power plants wins MIT $100K May 28, 2019
- Why Do Foreign Investors’ Attitudes toward Women Matter? May 28, 2019
- When less is more: coordinating innovation in open versus closed source software development May 28, 2019
- Social entrepreneurship: an emerging market perspective, some fresh evidence from Ghana May 28, 2019
- Influence of personal traits on social entrepreneurship intention: an empirical study related to Tunisia May 28, 2019