3 Factors Required for Success with Mobile Technologies for Development
October 12, 2013 Editor 0
Innovation and Best Practice in Mobile Technologies for Development is a review of innovation in the ICT entrepreneurship/mobile internet/mobile related applications space by Silvia Masiero, London School of Economics and Political Science. The paper aims to identify best practice in stimulating innovation in developing countries.
We sought to identify best practice in stimulating innovation in developing nations, with specific reference to Kenya. In this review, we have started by identifying innovation in mobile technologies for development, on the basis of evidence that mobile phones are the main technology owned by poorer people in developing nations.
Having reviewed the main facts and figures on mobile technologies for development worldwide, we looked at best practice in Kenya, in particular mobile banking and the striking success of M-PESA. We then reviewed sectors where best practice, in Kenya, is still to be achieved: namely, m-health and m-agriculture, both of which feature high demand by the Kenyan population. For each of these sectors, we have identified a set of examples of best practice.
The main lesson extracted by this helpdesk review is exemplified by M-PESA. On the basis of this experience, innovation, if it is to be fostered in mobile technologies in developing countries, requires the presence of three factors:
- a specific and wide market demand for innovation recognised by creative private sector actors taking initiative,
- a supportive government coordinating the process, and
- committed board of international donors supporting the innovation in all its phases.
The first factor – demand – is present in Kenya, with reference to both health and agriculture, which have therefore been selected here as key areas in which Kenya can expand through mobile technologies. We have seen various case studies of best practice in these fields.
The second lesson is that on the one hand, best practice in m-health seems to leverage crucially on demand, and on the role of the government in facilitating innovation mechanisms. On the other hand, m-agriculture leaves more room for private entrepreneurship, and seems to entail high path-dependence with previous experiences of mobile-based development (the strong interrelation between M-PESA, and the entrepreneurial venture developed under M-Farm, is an example of these dynamics).
Therefore, we conclude this report with the remark that innovation is cross-sectoral, and maintains this intrinsic feature even when “exported” into the imperfect markets that characterize developing nations.
- What are the emerging markets for mobile payments in EA
- Why a unified database of mobile users could mean an economic boom in Africa
- Mobile health targets women, yet many don’t have mobile phones
- Time to let loose? Why lawmakers should ease up on mobile banking rules
- 7 African Mobile Phone Service Tariffs and Bundles
- Global Ideas News Brief: Tech hubs in Libya and Egypt + Western Union goes mobile
Subscribe to our stories
- Virtual reality as an urban tourism destination marketing tool January 26, 2020
- Exploring VR experiences of tourists' attachment to a rural destination January 26, 2020
- Sustainable intensification: Is a systems perspective essential for integrated crop-livestock systems? January 16, 2020
- Disseminating maize agronomy technologies using interactive voice response in Malawi–the opportunities and pitfalls January 12, 2020
- Towards a communication-based typology of management control modes: showing the relevance of communicative action for entrepreneurial settings December 24, 2019