QUALITATIVE ENTREPRENEURSHIP AUTHORSHIP: ANTECEDENTS, PROCESSES AND CONSEQUENCES
May 1, 2013 Editor 0
Purpose – This paper reports on a systematic review of the writing practices and experiences of scholars who have published qualitative papers in the field of entrepreneurship. It evaluates existing knowledge about how ‘well-published’ entrepreneurship scholars go about writing up qualitative research. It identifies good practices in qualitative research authorship as self-described by authors. It identifies the antecedents, processes, and consequences of qualitative research authorship as self-described by authors.
Design/methodology/approach – Scholars who had published qualitative papers in five top ranked entrepreneurship journals over a twenty year period, were asked to complete a qualitative survey about their writing practices. A qualitative analysis of 37 usable replies was undertaken.
Findings – Entrepreneurship scholars perceive their qualitative research writing to be more enriching and philosophical than quantitative research. Although they feel strong connections with their research subjects, they find qualitative research difficult and time consuming to write up. It is hard to bridge the gap between working with large amounts of transcribed data and the editorial requirements of journals, without losing the vitality of data. Qualitative research and subsequent writing skills have often been learned by trial and error. Many are inspired by specific texts, which may include novels, poems or plays.
Research limitations/implications – This work shows how useful it is to discuss qualitative writing processes so that we may learn from the “blood, toil, tears and sweat” of those who have already successfully navigated both the writing and publishing of qualitative research.
Originality/value – Although there is a vigorous debate within the Entrepreneurship literature about the prevalence and suitability of different methods and methodological approaches, there is no explicit discussion of how researchers engage with writing up qualitative research for publication. The paper addresses this gap and shares insights and guidance from our community of practice.
Go to Source
- On the origins of the worldwide surge in patenting: an industry perspective on the R&D-patent relationship
- Get a Taxi – Anatomy of a Process Innovation
- South Africa’s telescope success may threaten gas plans
- Jobs, technology, and disruptive change
- Should You Automate Your Life So that You Can Work Harder?
- Ghana: Country Has Bright Future in Robotics Science – NASA Engineer
Subscribe to our stories
- SL Crowd Green Solutions September 21, 2020
- Digital transformation in the banking sector: surveys exploration and analytics August 3, 2020
- Why Let Others Disrupt You? Take the Smart Self-Disruption Journey! August 3, 2020
- 5 Tips for Crowdfunding During the Pandemic August 3, 2020
- innovation + africa; +639 new citations August 3, 2020