• What we do
  • The People
  • About Us
  • Why Innovation Africa
  • Contact Us
Innovation AfricaCreating the Future Today
  • Feature Articles
  • Innovation
  • Agriculture
  • ICT
  • Technology
  • Entrepreneurship
  • Health
  • Store
  • Contact Us
Menu
  • Feature Articles
  • Innovation
  • Agriculture
  • ICT
  • Technology
  • Entrepreneurship
  • Health
  • Store
  • Contact Us
  • How to Minimize Your Biases When Making Decisions

    September 27, 2012 Editor 0

    “There is always an easy solution to every human problem — neat, plausible, and wrong.” Little did he know it when he penned these words, but journalist H.L. Mencken was tapping into the very core of behavioral decision making and the need to understand and compensate for it.

    Every day, senior managers are tasked with making very significant strategic decisions for their companies, which usually require support by teams of internal and external experts and a heavy dose of research. Theoretically, knowledge-based decision making underpins every successful organization. But, as Plato pointed out, “Human behavior flows from three main sources: desire, emotion, and knowledge.” First-hand experience and best sellers like Daniel Kahneman’s Thinking, Fast and Slow have confirmed an even broader range of behavioral vulnerabilities and vagaries in our abilities to make decisions as human beings.

    For those of us tasked with modeling the risk/reward potential of various business opportunities, the need to address these influential, often subconscious factors in the modeling process is compelling. In the enterprise risk management (ERM) arena, in particular, it is mandatory that incisive analysis of decision options means taking rigorous steps to challenge not only the scenarios we develop, but also their underlying assumptions.

    From what we have learned from behavioral economists, we — as actuaries in the enterprise risk management space — outlined some of the most prevalent biases that creep into all kinds of risk/reward decision making — personal as well as professional. By acknowledging and shedding light on these sources of distortion we can strengthen the relevance and reliability of our decision-making strategies and assessment of potential risk manifesting from these decisions. We not only have to consider our own human biases, but also those of our audience, our team, and our competitors.

    (Click on the chart to view full-sized version.)

    decisionbias.jpg

    Minimizing the impact of these biases is crucial. They can sneak into any risk/reward management scenario we develop, unless we exercise considerable rigor at every stage of the process from assumption right through to the presentation of alternative scenarios and their attendant considerations. To address the kinds of biases outlined briefly here, we must challenge our decision making process by realizing that we both influence and are influenced by the format of the information. The above heuristics have served us well as human beings when we were employed in work such as tilling the land. They do, however, open us up for biased risk/reward decision-making when applied to today’s knowledge-based work. To minimize their impact, we must:

    • Search relentlessly for potentially relevant or new disconfirming evidence
    • Accept the “Chief Contrarian” as part of the team
    • Seek diverse outside opinion to counter our overconfidence
    • Reward the process and refrain from penalizing errors when the intentions and efforts are sound
    • Reframe or flip the problem on its head to see if we are viewing the situation in either a positive or negative framework
    • Redefine the problem from here on out and ignore the old problem to avoid escalation of unnecessary commitment
    • Develop systemic review processes that leave you a committed “out” possibility when trying to “cut the losses”
    • Avoid the potential for escalation or further emotional investment in faulty decisions engendered by premature “public” commitment.

    Throughout the process, it’s crucial to recognize that most risk does not manifest itself from some exogenous contingent event, but rather is driven by the behaviors and decisions of people. It is only by exercising the intellectual rigor to challenge our current views of the future and long-lived underlying assumptions that we gain the means to manage the real risks that face our enterprises. I have addressed the “individual” element here. I am strong supporter that it doesn’t end here. I encourage all to read the post by David Ingram and Mike Thompson who address that it is not only our behaviors as “individuals” that are relelevant, but also and perhaps rather, how we make risk/reward decision-making in groups.


    Go to Source

    Related Posts

    • Cognitive Biases Inhibiting Innovation in Top Management TeamsCognitive Biases Inhibiting Innovation in Top Management Teams
    • 9 Habits That Lead to Terrible Decisions9 Habits That Lead to Terrible Decisions
    • Cognitive consequences of business shut down. The case of Ugandan repeat entrepreneurs
    • How Decisions Can Be Organized – and Why It MattersHow Decisions Can Be Organized – and Why It Matters
    • 60-Second Drills Can Sharpen Your Business Reflexes60-Second Drills Can Sharpen Your Business Reflexes
    • Do “rising stars” avoid risk?: status-based labels and decision makingDo “rising stars” avoid risk?: status-based labels and decision making
    Sovrn
    Share

    Categories: HBR, Insights

    Tags: Behavior, biases, decision-making, risk

    How a Mobile Airtime Vendor Became Zimbabwe’s Fastest-Growing Bank Metrics Are Easy; Insight Is Hard

    Leave a Reply Cancel reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

Subscribe to our stories


 

Recent Posts

  • SL Crowd Green Solutions September 21, 2020
  • Digital transformation in the banking sector: surveys exploration and analytics August 3, 2020
  • Why Let Others Disrupt You? Take the Smart Self-Disruption Journey! August 3, 2020
  • 5 Tips for Crowdfunding During the Pandemic August 3, 2020
  • innovation + africa; +639 new citations August 3, 2020

Categories

Archives

Popular Post-All time

  • A review on biomass-based... 0.9k views
  • Can blockchain disrupt ge... 669 views
  • Prize-winning projects pr... 646 views
  • Apply Now: $500,000 for Y... 602 views
  • Test Your Value Propositi... 523 views

Recent Posts

  • SL Crowd Green Solutions
  • Digital transformation in the banking sector: surveys exploration and analytics
  • Why Let Others Disrupt You? Take the Smart Self-Disruption Journey!
  • 5 Tips for Crowdfunding During the Pandemic
  • innovation + africa; +639 new citations
  • SME Innovation: 10 Priorities for Support Post-COVID-19 
  • Africa RISING Annual Progress Report 2018 – 2019 now available
  • Fodder beet feed supplementation delivers dairy success for Ethiopian farmers
  • Using theory of change for outcome-oriented research
  • Africa RISING partners publish soil fertility management guidebook

Tag Cloud

    africa African Agriculture Business Business model Business_Finance Company Crowdsourcing data Development East Africa economics Education Entrepreneur entrepreneurs Entrepreneurship ethiopia ghana Health_Medical_Pharma ict Information technology Innovation kenya knowledge Knowledge Management Leadership marketing mobile Mobile phone nigeria Open innovation Organization Research rwanda science Science and technology studies social enterprise social entrepreneurship south africa Strategic management strategy tanzania Technology Technology_Internet uganda

Categories

Archives

  • A review on biomass-based hydrogen production for renewable energy supply 0.9k views
  • Can blockchain disrupt gender inequality? 669 views
  • Prize-winning projects promote healthier eating, smarter crop investments 646 views
  • Apply Now: $500,000 for Your Big Data Innovations in Agriculture 602 views
  • Test Your Value Proposition: Supercharge Lean Startup and CustDev Principles 523 views

Copyright © 2005-2020 Innovation Africa Theme created by PWT. Powered by WordPress.org