Implicit Evaluations of Intellectual Capital in Practical Decision Making
September 24, 2012 Editor 0
A lot of the confusion about the measurability of intellectual capital can be explained by a neglect of the difference between an object, the capital it provides, and the profit from the application of this capital. An analysis of this difference leads tothe distinction between the potential of intellectual capital for economic process and its actual realization. Case studies from different areas of managerial practice show that decision making about intellectual capital considers it both in the mode ofpotentiality and actuality.
However, the level to which the difference of modality is made explicit varies a lot. Talent management and network planning tend to minimize reflections about potentiality. This is possible because these reflections are an implicit part of the preceding activities in the company that provide the basis for the decision situation. In intellectual property management, decision makers have more freedom to consider the further potential of the capital in question.
In the application of different methods to evaluate intellectual capital, it therefore seems important to look for a strong consistency between the way how actuality and potentiality are taken into consideration by the structure of the business practice and the approach of the method.
Read more from the original source: Implicit Evaluations of Intellectual Capital in Practical Decision Making
- Developing organisational decision-making capability: a knowledge manager’s guide
- What determines the innovation capability of firm founders?
- Return Migration and the Survival of Entrepreneurial Activities in Egypt
- Innovation Method – Copy and Paste
- Act Fast, but Not Necessarily First
- Which Best Practice Is Ruining Your Business?
Categories: Knowledge Management
Subscribe to our stories
- Virtual reality as an urban tourism destination marketing tool January 26, 2020
- Exploring VR experiences of tourists' attachment to a rural destination January 26, 2020
- Sustainable intensification: Is a systems perspective essential for integrated crop-livestock systems? January 16, 2020
- Disseminating maize agronomy technologies using interactive voice response in Malawi–the opportunities and pitfalls January 12, 2020
- Towards a communication-based typology of management control modes: showing the relevance of communicative action for entrepreneurial settings December 24, 2019