-
Back to the future: revisiting Kotter’s 1996 change model
August 13, 2012 Editor 0
Abstract
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to gather current (2011) arguments and counterarguments in support of the classic change management model proposed by John P. Kotter in his 1996 book Leading Change. His work was based on his personal business and research experience, and did not reference any outside sources that has questioned its value. A current perspective on a limited tested model aims to be a focus of this paper. Design/methodology/approach – The literature on change management was reviewed for each of the eight steps defined in Kotter’s model, to review how much support each of these steps had, individually and collectively, in 15 years of literature. Findings – The review found support for most of the steps, although no formal studies were found covering the entire spectrum and structure of the model. Kotter’s change management model appears to derive its popularity more from its direct and usable format than from any scientific consensus on the results. However the model has several limitations, that are identified, impacting upon its universal acceptance and popularity.
Research limitations/implications – Further studies should examine the validity of Kotter’s model as a whole. More importantly, change management research should form a greater link with stakeholders in order to translate current research into a format usable by practitioners.
Practical implications – No evidence was found against Kotter’s change management model and it remains a recommendable reference. This paper attempts to “test” the “how-to-do-change management” with empirical and practitioner literature that was not evident in the original text. The model would be most useful as an implementation planning tool, but complementary tools should also be used during the implementation process to adapt to contextual factors or obstacles. Originality/value – Based upon a thorough review, this is the first formal review of Kotter’s change management model, 15 years after its introduction.
Go to SourceRelated Posts
Knowledge adaptation key to local innovation, finds review
Panel to review Africa’s science and technology roadmap
- InnovationAfrica: The year in review
- U of T Engineering breakthrough promises significantly more efficient solar cells
Thankfully, ICT4D is Now About Strategy and Implementations, Not Technovelty
South African teams back on track in solar car race
Categories: Management
Creating ‘Shared Value’: Delivering On Social Values Promoting Financial Inclusion: Is Mobile Money the Magic Bullet?
Subscribe to our stories
Recent Posts
- Entrepreneurial Alertness, Innovation Modes, And Business Models in Small- And Medium-Sized Enterprises December 30, 2021
- The Strategic Role of Design in Driving Digital Innovation June 10, 2021
- Correction to: Hybrid mosquitoes? Evidence from rural Tanzania on how local communities conceptualize and respond to modified mosquitoes as a tool for malaria control June 10, 2021
- BRIEF FOCUS: Optimal spacing for groundnuts in smallholder farming systems June 9, 2021
- COVID-19 pandemic: impacts on the achievements of Sustainable Development Goals in Africa June 9, 2021
Categories
Archives
Popular Post-All time
- A review on biomass-based... 1k views
- Can blockchain disrupt ge... 760 views
- Apply Now: $500,000 for Y... 751 views
- Prize-winning projects pr... 711 views
- Test Your Value Propositi... 686 views