A Firm-Level Analysis on the Relative Difference between Technology-Driven and Market-Driven Disruptive Business Model Innovations
July 16, 2012 Editor 0
Using the business model concept as a theoretical framework, this paper examines the relative disruptiveness potential between technology-driven and market-driven innovations. The study analyses retrospectively four case studies comprising two technologically sophisticated IT innovations and two technologically less sophisticated market-driven innovations starting from their inception to the point of disruption over a period of 5–15 years. It finds that, while the disruption process of technology-driven innovation conforms to the patterns predicted by disruptive innovation theory, the disruption process of market-driven disruptive business model innovation depicts a bottleneck shape, where the positive effects of initial strategic choice, model specialization and investments on disruptiveness potential reach the maximum level and start to stagnate due to the same initial strategic choice and cost factors. Implications for researchers and practitioners are discussed.
- Different practices for open innovation: a context-based approach
- Breaking down barriers to competition: Unlocking Africa’s potential through a regional platform for cooperation
- Biases and debiasing in bank lending decisions to nascent entrepreneurs – an experimental study
- Gender and water technologies use for irrigation and multiple purposes in Ethiopia
- Do SMEs Lose their Appetite for Innovation During the Economic Crisis?
- Towards a theory of corruption, nepotism, and new venture creation in developing countries
Subscribe to our stories
- SL Crowd Green Solutions September 21, 2020
- Digital transformation in the banking sector: surveys exploration and analytics August 3, 2020
- Why Let Others Disrupt You? Take the Smart Self-Disruption Journey! August 3, 2020
- 5 Tips for Crowdfunding During the Pandemic August 3, 2020
- innovation + africa; +639 new citations August 3, 2020